I invite you to read the article that made me fundamentally change my mind about Beppe Grillo (to whom I sent an email, an illusion of reading) link on the letter.
Dear Mr. Beppe Grillo,
I decided to send them an email hoping they can at least read it, knowing you taught me a lot with your attitude. I refer in particular to the post of Alexander Gilioli reported Blog Espresso.
consistency in his thought, I appreciated the intent (not quite the way) of the first V-Day I tried and the reasons why his indignation had reached the point lead in a loud FUCK and share them today. I trusted what he said so much to be hoped that the company probably would have been very good chance to get out of this stagnant state of ignorance. I liked the ideas of the Meet-Up (including myself), the leading citizens, and all his gestures acts if they do not solve the problem, to raise awareness. In the mass of ignorant you put me there I, too, are basically a boy of twenty, he does not know exactly how the world works and that does almost everything with his head until he slams somewhere. Here, my head is now slammed against his non-interview
non-issued Espresso. And there I was wrong.
may enforce all his speeches, from state subsidies to newspapers, their ties with political parties, the partiality of the information, the complete
"flooding" of news, but his speeches are useless against the presence of a "Caste "journalism, if you, Mr. Grillo, who is the mouthpiece of a movement for freedom of information, Mr. Berlusconi behaves worse in time," best ". You can argue that she is not a political, not public responsibility and has not promised anything to anyone and that it is up to you to decide who to be interviewed, after all she is a monologue, says the article. The problem is that once the tough criticism thrown the stone against power, dell'invettiva (almost defamation), once the responsibility of presosi mix (in my opinion wrongly) the satire do with politics and decided arbitrarily when this is a show and
when it comes to a "serious", can not withdraw her arm escaping any kind of comparison as the worst of cowards. E 'dutiful a clarification: the satire, you know better than me, is above all devoted to politics, but false anecdotes about politicians (as Sgarbi) and pass them to the truth "oath for children "in order to foster a feeling of pity, resentment, if not hatred, toward the person does not seem correct, and that's what I mean when I talk about a mix of entertainment and serious things.
He said that the media would not have paid any attention to the initiative scheduled for April 25, so it was not, and when the opportunity presented itself, the questions considered offensive and unworthy. Does it seem right? Politicians can, indeed, one must ask questions and she was not offensive and unworthy? I believe I have grasped what you mean.
In various comments to her last post we talk about "anti-car V-day, planning to table Article Espresso, why not shoot the Gilioli to zero even politicians. Assuming that these items (which at this point warning) is accurate, and of course assuming that the article is not a hoax, the fact remains that she has not behaved in a dignified way. A nice Vaffa they deserve it too, but maybe it's my fault, I gave too much importance. Probably you are right:
it is only a comedian and his only job is to make people laugh during a show, nothing more.
Regards.
